Adam Neumann’s Cult of ‘We’ Is Now the Cult of Web3

Placeholder whereas article actions load

WeWork co-founder Adam Neumann’s redemption story has begun, in keeping with Silicon Valley legend Marc Andreessen. His venture-capital agency has poured $350 million into Neumann’s residential real-estate startup Circulate, citing the entrepreneur’s “classes realized” — an understatement contemplating WeWork’s rollercoaster trip from $47 billion flexible-office large to its near-collapse.

Maybe unsurprisingly, there’s no point out of a smaller funding that can be a redemption of types: Neumann’s championing of tokenized carbon credit by way of a startup referred to as Flowcarbon, which is apparently unaffiliated with Circulate although each are backed by Andreessen Horowitz.

Whereas the $70 million in funds Flowcarbon raised in Could make it much less important, the agency’s current delay of its cryptocurrency launch seems to be like a cautionary story. As frothy moonshot investing strikes from We to Web3, blockchains are too usually proffered as an answer to many issues: extreme jargon covers confusion about viable use circumstances and retail crypto-traders are susceptible to getting fleeced.

The thought behind FlowCarbon is predictably noble and utopian: Assist combat local weather change by fixing the opaque and fragmented marketplace for voluntary carbon credit issued by corporations to buff their inexperienced credentials. “Goddess Nature Tokens” — $38 million of which had been reportedly offered as a part of the fundraising – would bundle collectively tokenized credit registered by initiatives like reforestation and discover consumers seeking to offset their very own carbon footprint. Or, as Neumann mentioned final 12 months, earn a living whereas serving to the surroundings.

However sticking a blockchain into the buying and selling course of seems to be lots like a hammer searching for a nail. The issue with the carbon-credit market is an absence of oversight and guidelines which have seen poor-quality credit get offered and re-sold with out lowering any carbon dioxide within the environment. Blockchains file, they don’t filter for rubbish: As carbon-offset program Gold Commonplace has put it, poorly-managed tokenization of carbon credit might find yourself both a waste of vitality or a “rip-off.”

This isn’t a brand new criticism of crypto, but it surely’s a obvious one as VC cash pours into Web3 with imprecise and heady techno-optimism. Some $267 million was poured into local weather or carbon-related crypto offers in 2021 and one other $156 million this 12 months by early July, in keeping with knowledge cited by the Wall Avenue Journal. Explaining why creating an intangible crypto-asset out of an already-intangible carbon asset will “incentivize climate-positive behaviors” — as Andreessen Horowitz put it when asserting its funding in Flowcarbon — is beginning to sound as complicated as Neumann’s well-known description of the We model as “elevating the world’s consciousness.” 

Current tokenized carbon initiatives haven’t precisely incentivized behaviors of the optimistic sort. The Dayingjiang III hydropower dam in China’s Yunnan province lately offered thousands and thousands of carbon credit to nameless entities by way of crypto platform Toucan, in keeping with Bloomberg Information, though it’s been working since 2006 — not an enormous assist for the surroundings. The scope for abuse has turn out to be so apparent that nations are cracking down on offset offers, whereas Verra — a carbon-credit challenge register — has introduced a halt to tokenizations pending new guidelines.

Whereas Flowcarbon claims to have a extra discerning method to bundling property, it seems to be on paper like extra complexity and opacity reasonably than much less. There’s no proof that tradable carbon tokens behave any extra sensibly than the various different speculative cash on the market. Because the under value chart of 1 challenge, Klima DAO, reveals, being “backed” by carbon credit isn’t any safety towards the bursting of a speculative bubble — and in addition suggests retail traders are being taken for a probably harmful trip.

Clearly, there’s potential in cleansing up the inefficiencies of the carbon-credit market. Nevertheless it’s not clear but why this can be a downside that needs to be solved by this particular platform reasonably than different establishments like banks, that are constructing options of their very own by way of the Carbonplace platform. It’s reasonably ironic that the one apparent demand crypto corporations might need for credit, specifically to offset wasteful crypto-mining, isn’t talked about.

So whereas consideration shifts to Neumann’s return to an apparently extra grounded and bricks-and-mortar world, full with the narrative of “classes realized,” it’s value maintaining a tally of the Goddess Nature Token as an indicator of the place the VC-powered cult of We finally ends up subsequent.

Extra From Different Writers at Bloomberg Opinion:

Greensill’s Ghost Will Hang-out the Finance World: Lionel Laurent

Police Techniques Are Chilling India’s Crypto Winter: Andy Mukherjee

• This Crypto Winter Will Be Lengthy, Chilly and Harsh: Jared Dillian

This column doesn’t essentially replicate the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its house owners.

Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist overlaying digital currencies, the European Union and France. Beforehand, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes.

Extra tales like this can be found on


Leave a Reply

    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop